What best describes the Green Revolution?

What best describes the Green Revolution?

• A. A set of high-yield crop varieties, irrigation, and pesticides introduced to increase agricultural production.
• B. A package of high-yield crop varieties, irrigation, and pesticides introduced to increase agricultural production; it increased yields in some regions but also increased inequality and environmental concerns.
• C. A policy focused on urban infrastructure development.
• D. A technology program promoting renewable energy in farming.

Answer: (B)

The main idea here is that the Green Revolution was a package of agricultural changes designed to boost crop yields. It combined high-yield crop varieties with more irrigation and the use of pesticides and fertilizers, plus modern farming practices, to dramatically increase production in many regions. The strongest choice recognizes both the positive and negative sides of this transformation. It notes that yields rose in some areas, showing the success of adopting these inputs and techniques. At the same time, it points out that the revolution also brought drawbacks—greater inequality because wealthier farmers could access and afford the new technologies, and environmental concerns such as soil depletion, water use issues, and pollution from chemicals. This balanced view captures why the Green Revolution is widely understood as having substantial food-production gains but uneven social and environmental impacts. The other options miss these important nuances or misfocus on unrelated topics, which is why they’re less accurate.

The main idea here is that the Green Revolution was a package of agricultural changes designed to boost crop yields. It combined high-yield crop varieties with more irrigation and the use of pesticides and fertilizers, plus modern farming practices, to dramatically increase production in many regions.

The strongest choice recognizes both the positive and negative sides of this transformation. It notes that yields rose in some areas, showing the success of adopting these inputs and techniques. At the same time, it points out that the revolution also brought drawbacks—greater inequality because wealthier farmers could access and afford the new technologies, and environmental concerns such as soil depletion, water use issues, and pollution from chemicals. This balanced view captures why the Green Revolution is widely understood as having substantial food-production gains but uneven social and environmental impacts.

The other options miss these important nuances or misfocus on unrelated topics, which is why they’re less accurate.